|
Post by Deodat Lawson on Oct 31, 2019 16:53:36 GMT
I am Deodat Lawson
|
|
|
Post by flopz on Oct 31, 2019 16:54:57 GMT
I am Matthew and I would like you to talk to me flopz. Did you not read the forum before your first post? Aloha Matthew, I blame phones for being more finnicky than computers in terms of scrolling capabilities. I somehow missed it the first time.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 16:55:34 GMT
I am Matthew and I truly believe that this will be the most insightful and helpful post for the rest of this game.
|
|
|
Post by flopz on Oct 31, 2019 17:03:14 GMT
For example, who are you in real life? When I manage to get to something that isn't a phone I'll update my profile picture to something more telling just for you.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:03:26 GMT
I am Matthew and I would like you to talk to me flopz. Did you not read the forum before your first post? Aloha Matthew, I blame phones for being more finnicky than computers in terms of scrolling capabilities. I somehow missed it the first time. I am Matthew and I can understand that. Now you have read though do you have any thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Deodat Lawson on Oct 31, 2019 17:03:45 GMT
I am Deodat Lawson, and I am not seeing any benefit or loss to revealing identities, other than things get dumb to read after the millionth time. Care to elaborate on why you are pushing for it?
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:08:55 GMT
For example, who are you in real life? When I manage to get to something that isn't a phone I'll update my profile picture to something more telling just for you. I am Matthew and I very much appreciate this. In reference to your vote on Demesne King. I think weather their question is alignment indicative or not is very dependent on who they are. My current suspicions are Ben, Ibad, Louis, Shan-Jun, and Barry. Any of them posting that could very well be a legitimate question as in many forum games it is normal to know if the scum team have a day chat or not. If it is anyone apart from them I would err on the side of more likely scum motivated fishing for town cred. I do also doubt it is a complete newbie to forum mafia as I do not think they would have considered it possible for a scum day chat.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:09:25 GMT
I am Deodat Lawson, and I am not seeing any benefit or loss to revealing identities, other than things get dumb to read after the millionth time. Care to elaborate on why you are pushing for it? I am Matthew and I will refer you to my post about the Demesne King vote.
|
|
|
Post by Deodat Lawson on Oct 31, 2019 17:19:52 GMT
I am Matthew and I will refer you to my post about the Demesne King vote. Sure, okay. So you're not asking people to start every post with an "I am Matthew" or the like? Incidentally, why do you do that? For revealing identities, I don't think it matters a lot either way. We'll learn to read people as the game continues - unless they don't post much, which is probably a way of concealing themselves and for not giving away who they are. In that case, people who remain quiet have something to hide....... Who's the current quiet person bandwagon on?
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:22:51 GMT
I am Matthew and I will refer you to my post about the Demesne King vote. Sure, okay. So you're not asking people to start every post with an "I am Matthew" or the like? Incidentally, why do you do that? I am Matthew and I don't think you have been reading all of my posts if you are asking such questions. As for bandwagons, not enough members in the game have posted/voted for one to have formed.
|
|
|
Post by Deodat Lawson on Oct 31, 2019 17:27:08 GMT
I am Matthew and I think it would be easier, for me at least, if everyone revealed their true identities. I will certainly find it much easier to read people this way and I'm sure a lot of you will too. As I proposed this idea I think it is only proper that I am the first to reveal so I shall. I am Matthew Reddy. You may know me as the Bulgarian train driver joke man. If you're referring to this post, it's not really much of an explanation, more than a declaration. But also, there are a lot of posts on this thread. I'm not even going to try to hold all of them in my head all the time.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:30:02 GMT
I am Matthew and I was referring to this post: I am Matthew and I thought it would be obvious that starting each of my posts with "I am Matthew and I..." is my gimmick for this game.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:30:40 GMT
I am Matthew and I think it would be easier, for me at least, if everyone revealed their true identities. I will certainly find it much easier to read people this way and I'm sure a lot of you will too. As I proposed this idea I think it is only proper that I am the first to reveal so I shall. I am Matthew Reddy. You may know me as the Bulgarian train driver joke man. If you're referring to this post, it's not really much of an explanation, more than a declaration. But also, there are a lot of posts on this thread. I'm not even going to try to hold all of them in my head all the time. I am Matthew and I am going to tell you that there are not a lot of posts in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Deodat Lawson on Oct 31, 2019 17:33:21 GMT
Subjectively
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 17:33:57 GMT
I am Matthew and I am being objective.
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Trion on Oct 31, 2019 17:53:10 GMT
I am Matthew and I would like to @alpha Triton at this point in time for clarification on how you are accepting votes. I only care about bolding and leaving-outside-of-spoiler-ing insofar as that makes it much more likely that I will not miss your vote. If I think a player is expressing a desire to have their vote put on something, I will put their vote on that thing. For example, earlier you made a post discussing vote formatting in which you said vote: [player] twice. I didn’t count either vote as I felt it was clear that you were talking about how votes were supposed to be formatted and not actually attempting to vote for either of them. If someone makes multiple votes in the same post, I will only count the last one. For example, suppose mattwereddy is on 8 votes (he’s at L-1). Some one else makes a post saying vote: mattwereddy. Unvote. I will only count the unvote, and so mattwereddy will not have been lynched.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 18:05:15 GMT
I am Matthew and I would like to @alpha Triton at this point in time for clarification on how you are accepting votes. I only care about bolding and leaving-outside-of-spoiler-ing insofar as that makes it much more likely that I will not miss your vote. If I think a player is expressing a desire to have their vote put on something, I will put their vote on that thing. For example, earlier you made a post discussing vote formatting in which you said vote: [player] twice. I didn’t count either vote as I felt it was clear that you were talking about how votes were supposed to be formatted and not actually attempting to vote for either of them. If someone makes multiple votes in the same post, I will only count the last one. For example, suppose mattwereddy is on 8 votes (he’s at L-1). Some one else makes a post saying vote: mattwereddy. Unvote. I will only count the unvote, and so mattwereddy will not have been lynched. I am Matthew and I would like to confirm I am understanding this correctly as "it is a vote if there is obvious intent to vote" no matter the formatting? So if I said "I am Matthew and I am going to vote for {insert name here}" that would classify as a vote?
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Trion on Oct 31, 2019 18:10:06 GMT
So if I said "I am Matthew and I am going to vote for {insert name here}" that would classify as a vote? Absolutely. If you said that and it wasn't in quotes and part of a question about whether or not it would count as a vote, I would count that as a vote.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Oct 31, 2019 23:47:10 GMT
I am Matthew and I think the current levels of activity are abysmal and people should start posting. more.
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Trion on Nov 1, 2019 0:28:14 GMT
hotwheels has unfortunately had to withdraw due to meatworld constraints. A replacement player has been found and will be introduced shortly.
|
|
|
Post by Milktoffee on Nov 1, 2019 1:07:21 GMT
So ignoring hotwheels, russianbot, ersand and alljokesaside have not yet posted in the thread.
|
|
|
Post by 50 Percent Banana on Nov 1, 2019 4:19:11 GMT
I think that lynching day 1 is normally an anti-town move. However, I have no idea if the majority of people are good people or bad people *wink wink nudge nudge* So I'm going to vote no eliminate I have temporarily put my amazing main strat on hold as this seems suspicious. This is because this person probably knows that lynching day 1 is important for information unless he's new (unlikely). Vote: Deodat Lawson
|
|
|
Post by 50 Percent Banana on Nov 1, 2019 4:25:03 GMT
I think that lynching day 1 is normally an anti-town move. However, I have no idea if the majority of people are good people or bad people *wink wink nudge nudge* So I'm going to vote no eliminate I am Matthew and I have been told that no lynching day 1 is an anti-town move (also see Jcraster's first post regarding your entrance). I think this is because we get reads form who is on the wagon, what they flip, who was pushing etc. Overall we should be lynching someone day one. vote:Deodat LawsonDeodat could possibly be a jester now that I think about it, although I doubt there were any suicidal transformers that would be used in this game as a jester role. I'll still vote for him, but we should keep an eye on him.
|
|
|
Post by mattwereddy on Nov 1, 2019 12:11:50 GMT
I think that lynching day 1 is normally an anti-town move. However, I have no idea if the majority of people are good people or bad people *wink wink nudge nudge* So I'm going to vote no eliminate I have temporarily put my amazing main strat on hold as this seems suspicious. This is because this person probably knows that lynching day 1 is important for information unless he's new (unlikely). Vote: Deodat LawsonI am Matthew and I would like to know this amazing main strategy of yours. flopz so you're Aurimas?
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Trion on Nov 1, 2019 12:18:29 GMT
hotwheels has been replaced by basmu! Please give them a warm welcome.
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Trion on Nov 1, 2019 12:32:10 GMT
russianbot, ersand and alljokesaside have been prodded.
|
|
|
Post by Milktoffee on Nov 1, 2019 14:54:47 GMT
Deodat Lawson, what is your input on these suspicions? Any reason why you believe lynching D1 is anti-town? I'm just interested in your thought process.
|
|
|
Post by Demesne King on Nov 1, 2019 16:17:07 GMT
Autobots, roll out! Hello to everyone. There's nothing to go on so I will also vote for lynchthequietpeople for now. This is concerning. Vote mario
This seems a bit suspect. Asking about if they have a chat screams like you're just forcing a Town read. Vote: Demesne King. Having a mod confirm a mafia daychat is extremely useful for predicting how mafia will interact with each other but not worth discussing at all within the game. I would be more scummy if I brought it up later on in the day.
|
|
|
Post by Demesne King on Nov 1, 2019 16:28:07 GMT
When I manage to get to something that isn't a phone I'll update my profile picture to something more telling just for you. I am Matthew and I very much appreciate this. In reference to your vote on Demesne King. I think weather their question is alignment indicative or not is very dependent on who they are. My current suspicions are Ben, Ibad, Louis, Shan-Jun, and Barry. Any of them posting that could very well be a legitimate question as in many forum games it is normal to know if the scum team have a day chat or not. If it is anyone apart from them I would err on the side of more likely scum motivated fishing for town cred. I do also doubt it is a complete newbie to forum mafia as I do not think they would have considered it possible for a scum day chat. You should check this account's post history. I am Matthew and I have been told that no lynching day 1 is an anti-town move (also see Jcraster's first post regarding your entrance). I think this is because we get reads form who is on the wagon, what they flip, who was pushing etc. Overall we should be lynching someone day one. vote:Deodat LawsonDeodat could possibly be a jester now that I think about it, although I doubt there were any suicidal transformers that would be used in this game as a jester role. I'll still vote for him, but we should keep an eye on him. This claim is unfounded, please explain your logic.
|
|
|
Post by Vector Si͈͍̣̹͍̱̖͢g̮̩m̰̠͓͙̲a on Nov 1, 2019 17:35:52 GMT
VOTECOUNT 1/11/2019
WITH 16 ALIVE IT TAKES 9 VOTES TO eliminate
mattwereddy - (hippocrates, Deodat Lawson) 2
Deodat Lawson - (mattwereddy, 50 Percent Banana) 2
mario - (Demesne King, lynchthequietpeople) 2
milktoffee - (friend) 1
Demesne King - (flopz) 1
alljokesaside - (redleader) 1
50 Percent Banana - (Milktoffee) 1
lynchthequietpeople - (mattwereddy, mario) 2
NOT VOTING - (jcraster, basmu, russianbot, ersand, alljokesaside) 5
|
|