|
|
Post by nothectic on Aug 23, 2019 15:09:13 GMT
Random vote TokioReasoning non participation this far suggests either relatively unengaged town or chance to be scum uncorrelated to onlineness Bear in mind that thilbert said in the dead chat of last game that they’d be v/la until “sometime next Saturday”, and that was during this week, so at least one player genuinely has limited access right now. Of course, that has no bearing on alignment, but personally I’d find it sucky to be killed before I have a chance to join the game. |
|
|
|
Post by offbyscum on Aug 23, 2019 15:09:33 GMT
>FOS on erratic for having contentless posts because I had a suggestion for power roles Kinda inconsistent logic there Unfortunately town is just as capable of contradictory arguments as mafia so it doesn't yet colour my opinion too much Let me rephrase that. Setup spec/questions isn't content as it comes the same way from town/mafia do doesn't help us read you. Two posts of only setup spec rings a possible alarm. Fine response though. wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Information_Instead_of_Analysis |
|
|
|
Post by Officer on Aug 23, 2019 15:09:55 GMT
It's Officer "Officer" Officer again. New inflow of data from higher up; nothectic, citceh, and erratic are not in cahoots together. I mean “do you really think Hectic would suggest this if he couldn’t come up with anything better. Obviously I’m not Hectic, I’m nothectic. If my approximation of the individual behind this alias is correct, nothectic's behaviour so far is in line with this individual's Behavioural Analysis results from previous town games, mostly from real life. A simple law-abiding citizen. Townreads are meaningless 3 pages into the game, and before a nightphase there's nothing concrete to be gained anyway. I'm not particularly worried about any "pressure" being applied here; it would be extremely scummy to eliminate me anytime soon given that the day lasts 11 irl days. If someone does hammer me, then you know who to kill tomorrow. rdaneelolivaw's lack of concern for providing reads is poor Policy Review Standards. The game cannot progress without the citizens of the town giving out reads, no matter how inaccurate or loosely based they may be. It gives us something to discuss and form more meaningful reads off of. Random vote TokioReasoning non participation this far suggests either relatively unengaged town or chance to be scum uncorrelated to onlineness A random vote on an individual that hasn't posted yet, instead of any of the citizens that have contributed and provided reads so far is a very poor random vote, certainly by the First Geneva Convention's standards. This sort of vote is unproductive and achieves nothing. . . . I have sent an inquiry out requesting erratic to provide any reads they may have on the current game state, and of any citizens that have posted so far. VOTE: erratic |
|
|
|
Post by erratic on Aug 23, 2019 15:40:22 GMT
Random vote TokioReasoning non participation this far suggests either relatively unengaged town or chance to be scum uncorrelated to onlineness Bear in mind that thilbert said in the dead chat of last game that they’d be v/la until “sometime next Saturday”, and that was during this week, so at least one player genuinely has limited access right now. Of course, that has no bearing on alignment, but personally I’d find it sucky to be killed before I have a chance to join the game. I was not aware of this, I'm not advocating an actual eliminate until much closer to the deadline Request for reads denied due to lack of evidence |
|
|
|
Post by erratic on Aug 23, 2019 15:47:48 GMT
Or at least until everyone has posted
|
|
|
|
Post by citceh on Aug 23, 2019 16:18:38 GMT
|
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 16:28:40 GMT
Nuzzles your necky wecky, hehe |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 16:29:33 GMT
Or at least until everyone has posted You can give your take on the people that have posted so far. What’s there to lose? |
|
|
|
Post by citceh on Aug 23, 2019 16:37:42 GMT
Nuzzles your necky wecky, hehe Ah, I see you are a man of culture as well. |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 16:41:48 GMT
Nuzzles your necky wecky, hehe Ah, I see you are a man of culture as well. Squirtle* |
|
|
|
Post by erratic on Aug 23, 2019 17:00:45 GMT
Sure having reread everything the only people that have posted at least 1 thing that isn't filler imo are
Offbymafia
Seaberalt
Rdaneeloliver
Myself
So I currently would rather eliminate someone other than these
Some people have posted nothing substantial others have posted nothing at all
You are now caught up on my reads
|
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 17:25:19 GMT
Sure having reread everything the only people that have posted at least 1 thing that isn't filler imo are Offbymafia Seaberalt Rdaneeloliver Myself So I currently would rather eliminate someone other than these Some people have posted nothing substantial others have posted nothing at all You are now caught up on my reads This certainly looks like an iioa post. Hmmmm |
|
alt
Jailor
My Walter count: 3
Posts: 222
|
Post by alt on Aug 23, 2019 17:33:25 GMT
Random vote TokioReasoning non participation this far suggests either relatively unengaged town or chance to be scum uncorrelated to onlineness A random vote on an individual that hasn't posted yet, instead of any of the citizens that have contributed and provided reads so far is a very poor random vote, certainly by the First Geneva Convention's standards. This sort of vote is unproductive and achieves nothing. . . . I have sent an inquiry out requesting erratic to provide any reads they may have on the current game state, and of any citizens that have posted so far. VOTE: erraticIts unfair to pin so much doubt on someone for a dodgy first random vote. My initial read is that you are blowing hot air about engaging with the game to feign engagement with a game that as of yet has no real content yet. vote citceh |
|
|
|
Post by dot on Aug 23, 2019 17:45:36 GMT
Wrong chat … I Claim Psychic Innocent Child. Secret Identity to everyone i know. Officer 'Officer' Officer = not (I)bad Unvote: Officer Vote: offByscum clearly scum
...
Please speak English. No hablo mucho inglés
...
|
|
|
|
Post by erratic on Aug 23, 2019 17:48:50 GMT
If I were forced to choose someone I was uneasy with then Officer had posted a lot without actually really saying anything other than filler imo
|
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 17:52:28 GMT
I’d like to remind Elements of rule 14. This is quite clearly some high level cipher |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 17:56:40 GMT
A random vote on an individual that hasn't posted yet, instead of any of the citizens that have contributed and provided reads so far is a very poor random vote, certainly by the First Geneva Convention's standards. This sort of vote is unproductive and achieves nothing. . . . I have sent an inquiry out requesting erratic to provide any reads they may have on the current game state, and of any citizens that have posted so far. VOTE: erraticIts unfair to pin so much doubt on someone for a dodgy first random vote. My initial read is that you are blowing hot air about engaging with the game to feign engagement with a game that as of yet has no real content yet. vote citcehCurious, very curious I agree with you despite you being mafia |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 17:59:44 GMT
erratic plz Some original content if you wouldn’t mind
|
|
|
|
Post by erratic on Aug 23, 2019 18:05:16 GMT
erratic plz Some original content if you wouldn’t mind Well if you note Officer wasn't in my list of people who had posted something substantial before your comment Although I do enjoy his flavoured posts |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 18:10:09 GMT
erratic plz Some original content if you wouldn’t mind Well if you note Officer wasn't in my list of people who had posted something substantial before your comment Although I do enjoy his flavoured posts I might have noted that if I could read |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 19:36:16 GMT
erratic plz Some original content if you wouldn’t mind Well if you note Officer wasn't in my list of people who had posted something substantial before your comment Although I do enjoy his flavoured posts You're only off the hook because I already know who the mafia and sk are. Otherwise I'd be wanting some town reads from you  |
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 19:36:51 GMT
Is there a way to do : ) without the space and without it turning into this hell spawn ? |
|
|
|
Post by Apprentice Seer on Aug 23, 2019 19:38:15 GMT
Having read through the chat, I feel the need to point out that we have no concrete information, so at this point, filler/empty content is better than not posting at all, since at least you have a chance of getting a read on someone if they post.
Random eliminate day 1 is definitely a town play statistically, and while random voting someone who hasn’t posted yet is a smidge unfair, it doesn’t really swing a read either way.
Also, as Apprentice Seer, I looked in the middle and saw the Seer card so anyone claiming that is lying (and therefore likely to be scummy).
|
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 19:43:37 GMT
Also, as Apprentice Seer, I looked in the middle and saw the Seer card so anyone claiming that is lying (and therefore likely to be scummy). What does this mean? |
|
|
|
Post by Apprentice Seer on Aug 23, 2019 20:05:07 GMT
Also, as Apprentice Seer, I looked in the middle and saw the Seer card so anyone claiming that is lying (and therefore likely to be scummy). What does this mean? Not much |
|
|
|
Post by Officer on Aug 23, 2019 20:12:06 GMT
Officer "Officer" Officer back with a minor report. Having read through the chat, I feel the need to point out that we have no concrete information, so at this point, filler/empty content is better than not posting at all, since at least you have a chance of getting a read on someone if they post. Random eliminate day 1 is definitely a town play statistically, and while random voting someone who hasn’t posted yet is a smidge unfair, it doesn’t really swing a read either way. Also, as Apprentice Seer, I looked in the middle and saw the Seer card so anyone claiming that is lying (and therefore likely to be scummy). A great Computer Aided Despatch by apprenticeseer here. It's far better to look for reads and tells, even where they may be none, rather than sit around and do nothing. Reads and lawbreakerhunting is what drives the game forward. alt and erratic are lacking Conductive Energy Devices. . . . I have made a General Inquiry to erratic regarding what about my early reads they find to be filler, and why a random vote on an individual that has likely not found the game yet is more useful than a random vote on an individual that is contributing. |
|
|
|
Post by Elements on Aug 23, 2019 20:14:22 GMT
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elements on Aug 23, 2019 20:14:30 GMT
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elements on Aug 23, 2019 20:14:36 GMT
Votecount 1.03
Offbyscum - (dot) L-8
Erratic - (player34, officer) L-7
rdaneelolivaw - (nothectic, offbyscum) L-7
dot - (rdaneelolivaw) L-8
nothectic - (citceh, town, ersatz) L-6
tokio - (erratic) L-8
citceh - (alt) L-8
alt - (seaberalt1) L-8
Not Voting: Apprentice Seer, Bingo, Blitzcrank, tokio
With 16 alive it takes 9 to eliminate
The day will end at 11:59 on the 1st of September unless a majority is reached before.
|
|
seaberalt1
Bus Interchange
Obviously not Seaber
Posts: 1,276
|
Post by seaberalt1 on Aug 23, 2019 20:19:40 GMT
Aug 23, 2019 21:12:06 GMT 1 Officer said: Officer "Officer" Officer back with a minor report. . . . Aug 23, 2019 21:14:30 GMT 1 Elements said: . Couldn't work out how to quote multiple people. WHAT DO THE DOTS MEAN? |
|
